<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Network Load Balancing recommended for Exchange 2010 CAS public facing (internet facing) and internal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottfeltmann.com/index.php/2009/10/21/network-load-balancing-recommended-for-exchange-2010-cas-public-facing-internet-facing-and-internal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottfeltmann.com/index.php/2009/10/21/network-load-balancing-recommended-for-exchange-2010-cas-public-facing-internet-facing-and-internal/</link>
	<description>Mostly Technical, but some just because!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:18:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.scottfeltmann.com/index.php/2009/10/21/network-load-balancing-recommended-for-exchange-2010-cas-public-facing-internet-facing-and-internal/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottfeltmann.com/?p=34#comment-307</guid>
		<description>Hi Frank,
I&#039;m going to say yes, with a HW load balancer you should be able to load balance the SMTP inbound traffic.  Keep in mind however that this is only four inbound SMTP traffic from the internet or a relay.   Internal Exchange communciation should continue to use the IP address of the actual Exchange Server. 

NLB can be used to provide high availability in the following scenarios: 
Load balancing of inbound SMTP connections for POP and IMAP client connections to the default Receive connector named &quot;Client &lt;Server Name&gt;&quot; that is created only on Hub Transport servers. 

--Load balancing of inbound SMTP connections for applications that submit e-mail to the Exchange organization.

--NLB should not be used to distribute connections for internal routing between Hub Transport servers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Frank,<br />
I&#8217;m going to say yes, with a HW load balancer you should be able to load balance the SMTP inbound traffic.  Keep in mind however that this is only four inbound SMTP traffic from the internet or a relay.   Internal Exchange communciation should continue to use the IP address of the actual Exchange Server. </p>
<p>NLB can be used to provide high availability in the following scenarios:<br />
Load balancing of inbound SMTP connections for POP and IMAP client connections to the default Receive connector named &#8220;Client <server Name>&#8221; that is created only on Hub Transport servers. </p>
<p>&#8211;Load balancing of inbound SMTP connections for applications that submit e-mail to the Exchange organization.</p>
<p>&#8211;NLB should not be used to distribute connections for internal routing between Hub Transport servers.</server></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Wang</title>
		<link>http://www.scottfeltmann.com/index.php/2009/10/21/network-load-balancing-recommended-for-exchange-2010-cas-public-facing-internet-facing-and-internal/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottfeltmann.com/?p=34#comment-304</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,
&quot;As a note it appears that the Hub Transport Server in 2010 is not supported for NLB,in many deployments&quot;

But if I install dedicate HUB server, can I deploy NLB?
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,<br />
&#8220;As a note it appears that the Hub Transport Server in 2010 is not supported for NLB,in many deployments&#8221;</p>
<p>But if I install dedicate HUB server, can I deploy NLB?<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
