Log in



Tags » ‘Exchange 2010’

Update Rollup 3 for Exchange 2010 SP1 and Exchange 2007 SP3

March 8th, 2011 by

The Exchange Team today released two new Rollups for Exchange 2010 SP1 and Exchange 2007 SP3.  More detail can be found here - Released: Update Rollup 3 for Exchange 2010 SP1 and Exchange 2007 SP3.

One thing to note are fixes for memory leaks in 2010 which I have seen in the wild.  This has caused some Exchange Servers to crash.  Glad to see this was addressed.   You can find a description of the rollup for 2010 here: http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=2492690

For the release notes for Rollup 3 for Exchange 2007 SP3 you can go here: http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=2492691

Have a great day everyone!

Riverbed Network appliance and Exchange 2010 DAG replication

February 28th, 2011 by

I had a colleague come up to me the other day talking to be about an issue he ran into regarding Exchange 2010 DAG and Riverbed WAN acceleration.

The setup was like this.  The client had a DAG setup that spanned across two sites.  This gives them site resiliency so they have their data in two datacenters.  The two sites were connected via wire with Riverbed appliances acting as a WAN acceleration between the two sites.  This means that the DAG was log shipping over the wire which was managed between two riverbeds.

Ok, so since the traffic was passing through the Riverbed appliance the compression ratio was only 24% and the traffic was going SLOW.  Why?  Well, by default log replication in a DAG employs compression and encryption!  Basically what was occurring is the Riverbed was trying to compress traffic that was already compressed causing slow network performance.

The solution?  Disable both compression and encryption on the DAG servers.  I’m not sure why you need to disable encryption, I was really surprised to find this out but the solution didn’t work with encryption is enabled.  And yes, this came directly from Riverbed support where this is a known issue, but not documented (it is now J).

How do you disable network encryption and compression on the DAG?  We will use the Set-DatabaseAvailabilityGroup command:

Set-DatabaseAvailabilityGroup -Identity <DatabaseAvailabilityGroupIdParameter> -NetworkEncryption Disabled

Set-DatabaseAvailabilityGroup -Identity <DatabaseAvailabilityGroupIdParameter> -NetworkCompression Disabled

By doing this you will optimize the WAN acceleration traffic between the two Riverbeds.  I was told the compression was at 74% and functioning properly!  Network communications were flying and problem solved!

Thanks Dan for sharing! 

Comments?  Please feel free to share!

Thanks!

KEMP Technologies today announced that its LoadMaster products are now approved by Microsoft’s® Exchange Server 2010 qualification program for hardware and software load balancers

February 8th, 2011 by

As a follow up to my previous article Looking for a list of NLB certified to work with Exchange 2010 CASArray I received an alert that Kemp Technologies are officially supported by Exchange 2010.  Below is the article:

———————————————————————————————————————–

Yaphank, N.Y. – February 8, 2011 – KEMP Technologies today announced that its LoadMaster products are now approved by Microsoft’s® Exchange Server 2010 qualification program for hardware and software load balancers. KEMP’s LoadMaster product portfolio, now optimized for Exchange Server 2010, delivers reliable server load balancing, application delivery and built-in SSL acceleration at affordable pricing.

 Load balancing is necessary with Exchange 2010 to achieve fault tolerance and optimal performance. With Exchange 2010, client connections are now handled by the Client Access Server (CAS) and both external and internal Outlook connections must be load balanced across the array of CAS devices to ensure performance. The KEMP LoadMaster family simplifies deployment of the complete portfolio of advanced messaging applications and protocols used by Exchange 2010. With built-in SSL acceleration and offloading, the LoadMaster improves CAS capacity. Moreover, the Layer 7 health checking ensures if one of the servers becomes inaccessible, the LoadMaster will intelligently take the server off-line, while automatically re-routing and reconnecting users to other functioning servers.

 “We continue to expand our support and services to customers and we are pleased to be approved by Microsoft for Exchange 2010, delivering low-cost load balancers without adding extra costs and features that customers just don’t need,” notes Peter Melerud, KEMP’s co-founder and VP of product management. “Our LoadMaster products easily integrate with Exchange and other Microsoft server applications such as MS Windows Terminal Services (WTS), Office Communications Server (OCS), Lync and Sharepoint to maintain high availability and optimal performance.”

 Only select vendors are eligible for Exchange Server 2010 qualification and the program is designed to ensure interoperability between vendors such as KEMP and Microsoft in a consistent and supportable manner. The portfolio of hardware-based LoadMaster products as well as KEMP’s Virtual LoadMaster (VLM) for Hyper-V™ is all approved for Exchange Server 2010. All KEMP’s products include a comprehensive first year warranty and technical support agreement with pricing starting at only $1,490. For more info, go to KEMP Technologies Exchange 2010 Deployment Guide.

———————————————————————————————————————–

Yup, that’s right.  I got this in my mailbox and thought I would share.  If you don’t have a NLB for Exchange 2010 I would suggest looking into the Kemp Technologies solution.  They are affordable and work well.   I have a few clients that have purchased them and so far so good!

Questions, comments?  Please share!

Looking for a list of NLB certified to work with Exchange 2010 CASArray?

January 28th, 2011 by

People often ask, hey Scott, when I’m doing an Exchange 2010 CASArray what are some of the hardware load balancers users can use.  Well, Rajith Jose Enchiparambil over on HowExchangeWorks.com has the list of the certified load balancers that work with Exchange 2010! 

You’ll notice that the Kemp NLB has been added recently, which is pretty sweet considering they are afforadable and get the job done for the small to medium size business.  In most large enterprises I will recommend a Cisco or F5 if they don’t already have one, but the Kemp is perfect for those small to medium size businesses that are looking for HA and don’t want to spend a ton of money. 

You can find more on the information here: http://www.howexchangeworks.com/2011/01/kemp-technologies-new-addition-in-list.html

Enjoy!

Exchange Team Announces changes to GAL Segmentation in 2010 SP2

January 27th, 2011 by

Yes, I’m alive, I’m very busy so I apologize for being absent for so long.

Anyway, the MS Exchange team posted an article today talking about GAL Segmentation coming available in Exchange Server 2010 SP2.  I find this rather awesome.  Especially when you have a single Exchange Org and multiple Business units that require their own GAL.

So, check out the Article on the MS Exchange Team Blog and Thanks guys for listening!

More on Outlook 2007 and Personal Archive

December 21st, 2010 by

Last week I posted an article (New Hotfix allows Office 2007 to support personal Archives on Exchange 2010!) about a patch (KB2458611) being made available for Outlook 2007 to support Personal Archive in Exchange 2010.  As you are aware MS mentioned that Outlook 2007 would eventually support personal archiving in Exchange 2010 eventually.  The KB2458611 made that a possibility. 

Yesterday afternoon the MS Exchange team posted a new article talking about Personal Archiving being supported in Outlook 2007!  You can take a look at the article on the MS Exchange Team blog by following this link: http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2010/12/20/457238.aspx

Enjoy and have a great night!

Multiple Updates for Exchange Servers Released

December 14th, 2010 by

The MS Exchange Team has announced today multiple updates for Exchange Servers. 

These updates include:

An update for Exchange 2010 SP1 – KB2425179 (Rollup 2 for Exchange Server 2010 Service Pack 1)  KB Details
An update for Exchange 2007 SP3 – KB2407025 (Rollup 2 for Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 3) KB Details
An update for Exchange 2010 RTM – KB2407113 (Rollup 5 for Exchange Server 2010) KB Details
An update for Exchange 2007 SP2 – KB2407132 (Rollup 5 for Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 2) KB Details and the Security Bulletin

Some points of interest of the Exchange 2010 SP1 Rollup 2 which I have seen in a few environments appear to be repaired in this update!  They are:

979921  (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/979921/ ) You cannot replicate a public folder from one Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 server to another, and Event ID 3079 is logged on the target server
and
981961  (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/981961/ ) Event ID 4033 is logged and the Free/Busy replication from an Exchange Server 2003 server to an Exchange Server 2010 server fails
I have to admit I’m looking forward to these two items being repaired.  Thanks Microsoft!
For more information from the MSExchange Team Blog you can see their posting here.

New Hotfix allows Office 2007 to support personal Archives on Exchange 2010!

December 14th, 2010 by

Microsoft has released a new hotfix for Outlook 2007.  Why is this good?  Well this hot fix will allow Office 2007 to support Exchange 2010 personal Archives!  This means that users of Outlook 2007 will now be able to see their personal archives meaning you will not need Outlook 2010 to use this feature!  For more information on what is Archiving in Exchange 2010 take a look at my blog article here

Otherwise I have yet to play with this Hotfix but it has come from a very good source.  So, take a look for the hotfix download, KB2458611

Exchange 2010 SP 1 introduces bug to Retention Tags

December 2nd, 2010 by

Hi everyone,

Since the release of Exchange 2010 SP1 I have seen a bug pertaining to Retention Tags at a few of my clients and I just wanted to alert the Exchange community out there that there is a bug with Retention Tags and deleting items.  Any time when you create a new tag and assign it to permanently delete it doesn’t appear to work or apply the policy to the email.  I am not aware of a work around at this time but I did find an interesting thread regarding the situation over on the MS forums so if you’re frustrated and having this problem keep an eye on the Thread.  My guess is there will be a fix in an upcoming Update.

URL: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/exchange2010/thread/56260407-4b15-407e-9079-2a97c79abf0c/

Good luck!

How to move Exchange 2010 System Mailboxes from a lost database

November 11th, 2010 by

As  many of you know Exchange 2010 has introduced some new default mailboxes in Exchange 2010.  These mailboxes consist of a Discovery Mailbox and an arbitration mailbox.  These mailboxes are default and configured for on the first mailbox server you deploy. 

I happened to run into an issue this week dealing with a new Exchange Server that had a corrupt LUN.  The LUN happened to be the location of the Exchange 2010 installation files and the database.  As a result the database was lost along with the Discovery Mailbox and the arbitration mailboxes.   The server had not been released to production yet so thankfully no user mailboxes were on the server. 

When trying to remove the database I received the error that the database still contained mailboxes, they may be the discovery mailbox, archive, or arbitration mailboxes.  Going to my Exchange Management Shell (EMS) I typed the comment Get-Mailbox –Database “Databasename”.  The list came back with the Discovery Mailbox which is created when preparing AD.  The task I had to do was move this mailbox.  Well, since the database was offline I could not go about the traditional method of moving a mailbox in Exchange 2010 using the New-MoveRequest command.

I then thought, what about the –ConfigurationOnly switch?  That used to be a handy tool in Exchange 2007, but as I found out it wasn’t available!  I then went on a mission to figure out how to move this guy.  Well, as luck would have it I found an interesting article that talks to the new way to move a mailbox without moving the data.  Reading the article I leveraged the following command to move all the mailboxes (the discovery mailbox) from the lost database to the new database.  The command I ran was: Get-Mailbox –Database “LostDatabaseName” | Set-Mailbox –Database “NewDatabase”.  This allowed me to move the configuration information in Exchange to point the account to the other default database.  (I should note the danger with this command.  If you were do run it on a live production mailbox it would only move the configuration information of the user only, not the actual data in the database, so be careful!)

This worked great, the only other problem I had now were the Arbitration mailboxes.  In order to see the Arbitration Mailbox you have to run the command Get-Mailbox –Database “LostDatabaseName” –Arbitration.  This command will show me the list of Arbitration Mailboxes:

ArbitrationPic1

Now that I have identified the arbitration mailboxes I had to move them to the new database.  The problem is I can’t just do a Get-Mailbox –Database “LostDatabaseName” – Arbitration |
Set-Mailbox –Database “NewDatabase”
.  When I run this command I receive an error stating “The Operation couldn’t be performed because object ‘domain.com/users/FederatedEmail.’ Couldn’t be found on domaincontroller.”  Bugger!

Seeing this error I figured I must be missing something.  Well, I figured that if I needed to specify a
“–Arbitration” in the command line then I need to specify it in the Set-Mailbox command.  So I ran the command Get-Mailbox –Database “LostDatabaseName” – Arbitration | Set-Mailbox
-Arbitration –Database “NewDatabase”.  The system then asked me to confirm the move and I hit Yes.  Now when I do the command Get-MailboxDatabase | Get-Mailbox –Arbitration I can see the mailboxes have moved!
ArbitrationPic2

See, Wasn’t that simple!

Hope you find this helpful out there, Please comment and share.